Why do we frequently fail in assessing others correctly? Why is it that those we thought to be great candidates while interviewing them turn out to be disappointments later?
Only this morning, we were in conversation with a
52-year old CEO of the Indian operations of a Fortune 500 company, whose CV
reads like this : Bachelor’s from one of the most renowned colleges in India, MBA
from one the best known institutions in
the world, and 30 years of work
experience, the first 20 years of which with an MNC that is probably the most respected
in India
He brought up the matter of a recent recruit, a Mr. X,
with national-level responsibilities, taken on board to provide strategic thrust
in an area of critical importance to the organization. ‘The way it’s going,
looks like things might not work out
with him’ said the CEO
Our immediate response : ‘Things will never work out’. In fact, we’d said so months earlier when we’d met with Mr. X
for the first time at one of our organizational transformation sessions
Let’s pause here
What is that we at Transforma foresaw that the CEO could
not? Are we clairvoyant? How is it that we saw it as a certainty, not a mere possibility? And reached conclusions that were not marginally, but radically different?
Remember, we are talking here of a recruitment
decision made by company which has tremendous standing world-wide. Strong
practices in multiple areas. As also a decision approved by an individual who
is marked not only by his academic or work-experience credentials, but a humane
and just person, given to taking well-considered actions
So what had we seen in Mr. X others couldn’t? The
answer does not lie in what others could not see, but in what we at Transforma ignore,
and what we instead choose to focus on
Over the last decade, in the course of assessing tens
of thousands of individuals from across companies, industries, levels, age-groups
and countries, a simple metaphor we have deployed is that of a tree, - a
metaphor we call the Transforma Tree. In this, a key point is that we allow
ourselves to jump to conclusions about the health of the tree by looking at its
visible part. The lushness of its foliage. Whether it is laden with fruit. The
profusion of flowers it has on show
The question is : will examining this truly help correctly
predict the future fruit-bearing
capability of this tree? What if there were a terrible storm? Would the tree
then survive? Or if there were three years of drought in a row? Would it
deliver in such harsh conditions?
That’s what we focus on while assessing others : not
the top, but the bottom part of the Transforma Tree. The part below the soil.
The part that is not visible to the eye. The part that tells us the true story.
Of whether this a case of a yet another genius only in a bull market or one
truly capable of delivering fruits even when the going gets tough
So we disregard the top part of the tree in an
individual, that part that we call ‘Aptitude’ – things like academic
credentials and scores, demographic details, domain expertise. And zero in on
the internalities, trying to sense
the non-visible parts – the part we call ‘Attitude’. The part that is made up
of his values, his belief-systems, the thoughts and feelings that drive his
actions in any sphere : personal or professional
For a genuine advance indication of what is to come
from an individual, the easy-to-scan externalities: aptitude, are of
near-irrelevance. It is the difficult-to-sense internalities that truly matter.
So do not stop at what the person already knows. Look instead for his ability
to learn, his openness of mind, whether he shares his knowledge. Note his
intelligence, but look for his ability to work hard, his tenacity, his
resilience. Not what he can do by himself, but along with others
It is by looking out for those with less-than-promising
root systems that we at Transforma write the chronicles of deaths foretold,
while even well-intentioned CEOs of large organizations sometimes allow themselves
to get carried away by the visible, - the part above soil-level
And it is through this primary focus on the
non-visible that we help organizations, including dealerships across the
country, improve their performance dramatically. By identifying for them which
of the current employees are not worth carrying further on their rolls. Who to
retain. Who to invest in. Who to promote. What responsibilities to give them
So where’s the barrier in putting this to practice? Ah,
- it’s in how we allow our minds to work
Don’t think so? Let’s try just one of many well-known
examples
Take a look at these two thumbnail sketches. Which one
does our conditioning make us believe holds more promise : Person ‘A’ – kicked
out of office twice, used opium in college, sleeps until noon and drinks a
quart of whiskey every evening, or Person ‘B’ - a decorated war hero, a
vegetarian, a non-smoker, who drinks an occasional beer and never cheated on
his life-partner?
Made your choice?
And you chose Person ‘A’ – Winston Churchill or ‘B’ –
Adolf Hitler?

No comments:
Post a Comment